We have a handbook on templates for communicating with the journal which includes a template for inquiring about the status of a paper.
So, don't lose patience if you do not see any status change over the next month, you can send a polite inquiry. This process can sometimes take several weeks. Once the editor starts checking it, the status will change to "With editor" or "Evaluating recommendation." Your paper is possibly still waiting to be checked by the editor. It is possible that your paper has not yet gone to the editor, since there are other papers that have come in before yours. Generally, journals receive a large number of submissions and the editor has to handle multiple submissions. However, because the reviews were usually quick, it does not necessarily mean that the decision will also be quick. While it is generally uncommon for the peer review to be completed within 6 days, since this is a revised manuscript, the reviewers were probably already familiar with it, so they could review it within a short time. Authors should also consider how the interpretation of the study’s findings may be affected by the study limitations.When the status shows "Required reviews completed," it means that the reviews have come in. What Do These Findings Mean? Authors should reflect on the new knowledge generated by the research and the implications for practice, research, policy, or public health. Include a marked-up copy of your manuscript file showing the changes you have made since the original submission. Do include the headline numbers from the study, such as the sample size and key findings. What Did the Researchers Do and Find? Authors should briefly describe the study design that was used and the study’s major findings. Why Was This Study Done? Authors should reflect on what was known about the topic before the research was published and why the research was needed. 4bd: Processing Revised Manuscript: Corrected revised manuscript has been submitted and is now being. 4bc: COI’s required (Revised manuscript received) Conflict of Interest forms are still to be received for at least one of the authors of the paper. Bullet points should be objective, brief, succinct, specific, accurate, and avoid technical language. Resubmitted manuscript received: Revised manuscript received by the Dove Editorial offices. We ask authors to provide 2-3 single sentence bullet points for each of the following questions. The text is subject to editorial change and should not simply repeat text from the abstract or manuscript. Authors should avoid the use of acronyms and complex terminology wherever possible. Authors should aim to highlight where the research study fits within a broader context and present the significance or possible implications of the study simply and objectively. The aim of the Author Summary is to make your findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. The Author Summary will be included as part of the manuscript to immediately follow the Abstract in published articles. We ask that all authors of research articles that are revised following peer-review write a short non-technical summary of their research for non-expert readers. Read the figure guidelines for more information about figure requirements at revision.
Upload a TIFF or EPS file for each figure if you have not already done so. Upload a clean copy of your revised manuscript that does not show your changes. Upload this as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted” file. The best way to show these changes is the “Track Changes” option in Microsoft Word. Include a marked-up copy of your manuscript file showing the changes you have made since the original submission. Upload this document as a “Response to reviewers” file. Remember, if you choose to publish the peer review history of your manuscript, your response to reviewers will appear online alongside the final article. Include your responses to all the reviewers’ and editors’ comments and list the changes you have made to the manuscript.
#Revise manuscript download
Download the formatting checklist (PDF).Īddress the specific points made by each reviewer. We recommend that you refer to our checklist of formatting requirements before resubmitting in order to expedite your manuscript through the technical checks. The journal performs technical checks when you resubmit your manuscript to ensure that it meets our formatting and publishing requirements.
0 kommentar(er)
